Below is a summary of an interview with Elie Feder and Aaron Zimmer. You can also watch the full presentation of the argument on their YouTube channel or read a summary of the argument from fine-tuning, design, and order.
2 Rabbis vs 1 Atheist
1. Introduction & Background (00:00 - 05:00)
Dogma Debate host Michael welcomes Elie and Aaron, who run the Physics to God podcast.
They are both Modern Orthodox rabbis with a passion for science and religion.
The podcast focuses on scientific arguments for the existence of God, particularly using physics.
Their interest in the fine-tuning argument began about 15 years ago after reading about the concept.
2. Judaism & Science (05:00 - 10:00)
Many Jewish people maintain their cultural identity without believing in God.
The rabbis clarify that their argument is not about proving Judaism or the Torah but about making a rational case for God’s existence.
They emphasize that Jewish tradition allows non-literal interpretations when science contradicts a literal reading of the Torah.
Studying the Talmud is a rigorous intellectual exercise that sharpens analytical thinking.
3. The Fine-Tuning Argument (10:00 - 25:00)
Physicists have discovered around 25 fundamental constants (e.g., the fine-structure constant, 1/137.035).
These constants are precisely tuned to allow the existence of atoms, molecules, stars, and galaxies.
Even slight changes to these numbers would result in a chaotic, unstructured universe.
Richard Feynman called the existence of these constants “one of the greatest mysteries in physics.”
The rabbis argue that such precise fine-tuning is best explained by an intelligent cause rather than mere coincidence.
4. Multiverse vs. Intelligent Design (25:00 - 40:00)
A common counterargument from atheists is the multiverse theory, which suggests an infinite number of universes with different physical constants.
In this view, we just happen to exist in the universe where conditions allow life.
The rabbis argue that this theory is untestable and essentially a "multiverse of the gaps"—a way to avoid acknowledging a designer.
They highlight that believing in an infinite multiverse leads to absurd conclusions (e.g., universes where the Red Sea parts randomly or where a sound wave declares "I am God").
They claim that scientists use the multiverse to explain away fine-tuning rather than address it directly.
5. Limitations of Scientific Knowledge (40:00 - 50:00)
Michael expresses skepticism, noting that science still has many unanswered questions (e.g., dark matter, dark energy).
The rabbis agree but argue that science is still capable of making compelling inferences.
They argue that just because science doesn’t yet fully understand something doesn’t mean we should reject all existing evidence.
They suggest that fine-tuning points more strongly to an intelligent cause than to a random multiverse.
6. Final Thoughts & Debate Conclusion (50:00 - End)
Michael acknowledges that the fine-tuning argument is compelling but maintains that unanswered questions leave room for doubt.
The discussion ends with a teaser for further debate on the multiverse and God’s nature in the Physics to God podcast.
Michael encourages listeners to join the Dogma Debate Patreon to continue the conversation.
Comments